Essay on mercy killing in india

A prime example of this would be the late Dr Harold Shipman, who killed between and elderly women[[ Bonnie Malkin et al " Harold Shipman in dictionary of biography" http: The system allows organ donation to be completed more efficiently, effectively and even at all in some cases.

Consciousness of the patient is strongly encouraged, so that if dying, one may prepare to accept to meet God. Voluntary Euthanasia gives doctors too much power The prestigious position of doctors could quite easily be abused if euthanasia were to become legalised.

They may feel guilty about the burden that they are putting on their families and choose to die for this reason alone. Because of immaturity of their minds in their age, they tend to act or overreact in desperate haste.

Essay on Euthanasia: an offence covered under Section 309 of IPC

However, as a rule, one can discontinue "medical procedures that are burdensome, dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate to the expected outcome. A inequality in palliative care in places around the world is not enough to justify its circumvention. In this competitive world to live with comfort, mental peace and satisfaction is not an easy task, a greed of more and more happiness does not let us sit calm and everyone wants basic amenities of life which are essential to live with happiness, it is the responsibility of state to protect individual from external aggression as well as to provide basic amenities for his survival with the emerging concept of welfare state.

Now from foregoing discussion we come to the conclusion that, Life is regarded as a gift of God and God alone can take it.

Essay On Mercy Killing In Hindi

Due to complexity, each situation needs to be looked at individually when discussing extraordinary means. On behalf of Aruna, her friend Pinki Virania social activist, filed a petition in the Supreme Court arguing that the "continued existence of Aruna is in violation of her right to live in dignity".

Union of India, 3 SCC In this case the petitioners had challenged the validity of section on the ground that it was violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution and The S.

What is being advocated is the right of an individual to make a decision, not to have a say or coerce an individual to make the decision to want to die.

Suffering and pain is manageable, especially today, with so many medicines and treatments available. Palliative care, not death, is the answer. Making the decision for yourself, or others?

They consider euthanasia the equivalent of murder, which is against the law everywhere in civilized society. Pain killers can be prescribed as long as there is no danger or intention of death. Even if a decision is taken by the near relatives or doctors or next friend to withdraw life support, such a decision requires presence of two witness and countersigned by first class judicial magistrate, and should also be approved by a medical board Essay on mercy killing in india up by the hospital.

Oath as such has lost all its credence in the present time. Since physicians cannot be held responsible for wrongful deaths if they have acted in good faith, substandard medical practice is encouraged, physicians are protected from the con-sequences, and patients are left unprotected while believing they have acquired a new right, and ultimately defeats the purpose of legalizing PAS.

During the attack she was strangled with a chain, and the deprivation of oxygen has left her in a vegetative state ever since. Both sides agree that laws can indeed change, but when should these laws should change is where the debate lies.

Disposing of the petition filed by one Pinky Virani on behalf of Aruna shanbaug, a K. The Price They Pay The opposition stands with critics of PAS who have found that once assisted suicide is accepted as an available option for competent terminally ill adults, it may be permitted for ever-larger groups of persons, including the non-terminally ill, those whose quality of life is perceived to be diminished by a physical disability, persons whose pain is emotional instead of physical, and so forth.

When the murderers are let free, just because they are able to pay a large sum of money, then why not allow the doctors to put some patients to sleep, so that they may not have to suffer from pain and trauma of being ill? This decision of Bombay High Court created a large controversy and created a variety of views in society on this issue.

We see this in the status quo already - governments have ceased to consider suicide a crime. It must be stated that even the protagonists who are in favour of legalising euthanasia have expressed a view that it should be permitted in extreme exceptional cases where there is no chance of survival of a person or where his pain and suffering are incurable.

That should be left unto God to decide. We believe no person or government has a right to keep these people entangled in a web of suffering. These patients, whether having an incurable disease, being elderly, or suffering in other ways, are crying out for help and love.

If Christ endured immense suffering, then why do we expect any less? What we seek in human existence is to be happy, and find happiness. It will benefit the patient and not harm him. It can be a family duty to do the right thing for the person and society. But, probably, every cloud has a silver lining!

In this scenario, making suicide an option is not offering a genuine choice but instead forcing a decision on the patient who again loses rights under this plan the affirmative have presented. But there is no such Right like right to die.

If the person is in a coma or is brain dead, that person is no use to himself or herself, or society anymore.

PAS limits the view of the patient to a mere biological mass. Too many people still suffer needlessly, often because doctors and families just do not know how to serve people who are dying.indian penal code project on should mercy killing in india be legalised – a critical analysis rajiv gandhi national university of law, punjab, patiala.

Despite being a humanitarian endeavor, Euthanasia / Mercy Killing is considered a very sensitive subject in India and there are many reasons for that.

- Euthanasia Essay - Mercy Killing Not Necessary "Mercy Killing" as Euthanasia is also known, has been outlawed within the United States. The definition of mercy killing is where someone is terminally ill with a disease, and an accomplice helps to end the misery of that victim's life.

Essay on Euthanasia: an offence covered under Section of IPC In India, euthanasia is an offence covered under Section of IPC i.e., attempt to suicide. (Mumbai) nurse seeking permission for mercy killing as she was sexually assaulted by a ward boy of that hospital 37 years ago and was permanently in a vegetative state (PVS.

Free essay on Euthanasia, "Mercy Killing"? available totally free at, the largest free essay community. Apr 24,  · Essay on Euthanasia (Mercy Death) in India. ***** Other Important Videos from SSC Sarathi - https://ww.

Essay on mercy killing in india
Rated 4/5 based on 35 review